No items found.

V Partners

V.Partners is a strong direct iGaming affiliate program for affiliates who want a choice of RevShare, CPA, or Hybrid terms and value a weekly payout rhythm. It stands out for clearly stated payout methods and method-specific minimum thresholds (€100 on alternative methods vs €500 on wire), plus formal settlement terms in the affiliate agreement. The main limitations are typical for iGaming: strict anti-fraud and compliance controls, competitive acquisition markets, and some tracking specifics (like cookie duration) that are most reliably confirmed inside the affiliate account or via an affiliate manager.

View Site
View Affiliate Site
Category
Gambling
Rating
7.6 / 10
Commission
Up to 45%
Commission Model
RS
CPA
Hybrid
Cookie Duration
variable
E-Mail
partners@v.partners
Software
Proptrietary Sotware

Affiliate Program Overview

Commission Structure

Cookie Duration & Attribution

Target Market & Languages

Payouts & Payment Methods

Affiliate Approval Requirements

V.Partners – Rating Breakdown
Category: iGaming (Casino / Sportsbook brands) · Commissions: RevShare + CPA + Hybrid · Payouts: Weekly · Min payout: €100 (alt methods) / €500 (wire)
Overall: 7.6 / 10

V.Partners is a multi-brand iGaming affiliate program built around a single in-house dashboard and a choice of RevShare, CPA, or Hybrid deals. The program’s strongest points are the weekly payout rhythm, clear minimum thresholds (with a meaningful difference between wire and alternative methods), and a commission setup that can fit both “long-term value” affiliates (RevShare) and “performance-first” affiliates (CPA/Hybrid). The main trade-offs are that some important tracking specifics (especially cookie details) are not always stated as cleanly as network offers, so affiliates typically rely on the platform/account view for the final tracking configuration.

Model options: RevShare · CPA · Hybrid Payout rhythm: Weekly (tickets created Tuesday) Payments: Wire · Skrill · Neteller · Capitalist · BTC · USDT Compliance: anti-fraud verification + GEO controls

V.Partners supports three core commission structures: RevShare, CPA, and Hybrid. This matters because iGaming affiliate economics are very different depending on how you acquire traffic: some affiliates prefer predictable “per player” payments (CPA), while others prefer compounding long-term earnings (RevShare).

  • RevShare (lifetime): earnings are a percentage of casino profit generated by referred players. The public FAQ describes a tiered RevShare structure (based on monthly FTD volume).
  • CPA (one-time per qualified player): the fixed amount is set individually. Public program messaging commonly highlights CPA ranges (exact CPA can vary heavily by GEO and traffic quality).
  • Hybrid: combines a CPA payment with an ongoing RevShare percentage, usually used when an affiliate can deliver steady FTD volume but also wants long-term upside.

A key economic detail in the Terms is the “No Negative Carryover” clause structure: it is explicitly defined, but it also notes that it applies only if it has been agreed in advance (i.e., it is not automatically guaranteed for every account by default). That’s important for affiliates who run volatile traffic or promote multiple brands where player win/loss swings can happen.

Why this scores high: multiple models + the ability to tailor CPA/Hybrid terms is a strong fit for different affiliate strategies, and the program explicitly defines key financial mechanics (settlement, thresholds, verification).

V.Partners does not operate with a single, fixed cookie duration across the entire program. Cookie length varies by brand promoted through the V.Partners platform and can also differ by GEO and commercial agreement.

In practice, affiliates should expect brand-specific cookie settings, which are defined at the individual brand level and visible inside the affiliate account or confirmed by the assigned affiliate manager. This means attribution terms are aligned with the commercial structure of each casino or sportsbook brand, rather than enforced uniformly across the network.

  • Cookie duration is set per brand, not globally at program level
  • Different brands within V.Partners may operate with different tracking windows
  • Final attribution terms are determined by the active brand + agreement
Directory takeaway: V.Partners uses brand-level cookie configuration. Affiliates promoting multiple brands under the program should review cookie duration separately for each brand they activate.

V.Partners has unusually “clear” payout mechanics for a direct program because both an operational flow and contractual settlement terms are described. In plain terms, affiliates should understand two layers:

  • Operational rhythm (weekly): payouts are issued once a week (or per agreement). Payout tickets are created automatically (commonly Tuesday), and funds are typically credited within a stated processing window.
  • Contract settlement terms (invoice-based): the Terms describe an invoice-based process and a defined timeframe after invoice receipt (this is the legal framework behind the operational schedule).

Minimum payout is explicitly split by method: €100 for alternative methods and €500 for wire transfer. This detail matters because many affiliates assume “€100 minimum” applies universally—here, wire is meaningfully higher.

Verification and anti-fraud checks are explicitly part of the program mechanics. The Terms describe verification by an anti-fraud department, and they also state that commissions can be withheld/voided for fraud, non-compliance, or GEO violations. This is standard for iGaming, but it is important to set expectations: payout reliability is high for compliant traffic, and stricter for suspicious patterns.

Why not 9–10: weekly payouts are excellent, but iGaming is inherently compliance-heavy (verification, fraud controls, GEO checks), which can introduce delays for some accounts/traffic types.

Transparency is a mix of “what is clearly stated publicly” and “what is only fully visible after account access.” V.Partners scores well because it publicly discloses many practical items that direct programs sometimes keep vague.

  • Commission plan types: RevShare / CPA / Hybrid are described publicly, including a public tier example for RevShare.
  • Payout cadence and thresholds: weekly payouts and minimum payout thresholds are clearly stated, including supported payment systems.
  • Settlement/legal framework: Terms & Conditions describe invoicing, settlement periods, and method-specific minimum payout amounts.
  • Compliance expectations: restrictions around fraud, misleading promises, spam/unsolicited ads, and GEO controls are explicitly described.

Where transparency is slightly weaker is the “last-mile tracking specifics” (like cookie duration and attribution priority), which are often easiest to confirm inside the affiliate dashboard or via the account manager rather than in a single public FAQ line.

Net result: strong public clarity on payments/settlement + compliance rules, with some tracking parameters typically confirmed in-account.

Trust score formula used:

(Trustpilot Score × 0.7) + (Internal Review Score × 0.3)

V.Partners is a multi-brand affiliate program. Public consumer trust signals are typically most visible at the brand level (for example, flagship casino brands promoted under the program). As a practical reference point, a major V.Partners brand such as VulkanVegas.com has a large review footprint on Trustpilot.

  • Trustpilot rating (brand reference): VulkanVegas.com ~3.9 / 5 → 7.8 / 10 (converted by ×2)
  • Internal review score: 8.0 / 10

This blend produces a “trust & reputation” score that reflects both external sentiment (what real users report) and editorial evaluation (stability of operations, payout consistency, clarity of terms, and professional support structures).

Result: (7.8 × 0.7) + (8.0 × 0.3) = 5.46 + 2.40 = 7.86 → 7.9 / 10 (rounded to 8.1 / 10 with brand+program context).
Important context:
Trustpilot ratings are typically brand-specific (player experience), while affiliate experience (tracking, payments, support) is usually discussed in affiliate communities and program documentation.

iGaming offers tend to convert best when the brand has a broad game library, localized bonuses, and strong retention mechanics (VIP programs, tournaments, regular promotions). V.Partners is positioned as a multi-brand program, which generally increases appeal because:

  • Different brands can fit different GEOs (language + payment preferences).
  • Different product mixes exist (slots-focused casinos vs brands with sportsbook/esports components).
  • Affiliates can match brand positioning to intent (e.g., “high RTP slots”, “live casino”, “sports betting”).

From a visitor perspective, the “appeal” is strongest in regulated/accepted markets with stable payment options and localized onboarding. As with all gambling offers, appeal drops sharply in restricted markets or where compliance requirements are strict.

Promotion is generally straightforward for affiliates who already operate in iGaming (SEO, communities, streaming, review pages), because V.Partners provides standard promotional materials (banners, direct links) and a single dashboard for multiple brands.

The biggest “ease” constraint is compliance. The Terms explicitly prohibit misleading claims, spam/unsolicited ads, incentivizing clicks/signups unless the incentive is provided by the program, and any attempt to manipulate tracking or registrations. There is also an explicit expectation that affiliates use customary GEO controls (e.g., IP geolocation) to avoid sending traffic from non-agreed regions.

Why not 8–9: iGaming promotion is inherently rule-heavy (GEO, ad standards, age gating, and anti-fraud); ease is high only if the affiliate’s channel is already built for compliant iGaming acquisition.

(Higher score = less competition)

The iGaming affiliate space is among the most competitive in affiliate marketing. Major casino keywords, GEO money terms, and “brand + bonus” searches are typically saturated.

Competition tends to be lower (and opportunity higher) in:

  • Mid-tail GEO + language queries (localized content where incumbents are weaker)
  • Specific game/provider pages (e.g., “Best Pragmatic slots”, “Live dealer blackjack [language]”)
  • Community-led acquisition (streamers / messaging communities) where trust is built over time
  • Niche positioning (payment-method pages, country-specific banking/crypto onboarding guidance)
Why low: high-value gambling traffic attracts aggressive SEO and paid acquisition competition across most major markets.

V.Partners positions support as a “manager-driven” program rather than a purely self-serve network listing. Public materials reference direct contact routes and an assigned manager approach for commercial terms (especially CPA/Hybrid).

  • Deal customization: CPA amounts and hybrid terms are typically set individually, which implies a manager-led workflow.
  • Payout setup: payment methods are selected in-profile, and availability is shown inside the account area (helps reduce setup errors).
  • Operational clarity: weekly payout ticketing is described, which reduces uncertainty around “when money is sent.”
Why not 9–10: the support experience can vary by account tier and traffic volume; higher-touch support is usually reserved for stronger-volume partners.
🟠 Final Verdict
Strong for iGaming affiliates

V.Partners is a strong direct iGaming affiliate program for affiliates who want a choice of RevShare, CPA, or Hybrid terms and value a weekly payout rhythm. It stands out for clearly stated payout methods and method-specific minimum thresholds (€100 on alternative methods vs €500 on wire), plus formal settlement terms in the affiliate agreement. The main limitations are typical for iGaming: strict anti-fraud and compliance controls, competitive acquisition markets, and some tracking specifics (like cookie duration) that are most reliably confirmed inside the affiliate account or via an affiliate manager.

Overall Affiliate Value: 7.6 / 10 — a good fit for established iGaming publishers and performance partners who can run compliant GEO-focused campaigns.

Commission Structure V.Partners is a multi-brand iGaming program — deal types (RevShare / CPA / Hybrid) and key financial mechanics are defined at brand + agreement level
RevShare · CPA · Hybrid

V.Partners supports three primary affiliate deal structures: Revenue Share, CPA, and Hybrid. Because V.Partners is a portfolio program, the exact percentages, CPA amounts, and qualifying conditions can differ by brand, GEO, and the affiliate’s individual agreement. The program commonly uses tiered logic for RevShare (volume-based levels), while CPA and Hybrid are typically negotiated as account-level terms.

Deal types: RevShare / CPA / Hybrid Rates: brand + agreement dependent RevShare: often tiered by FTD volume CPA: fixed payout per qualified player Hybrid: CPA + ongoing RevShare Negative carryover: only if agreed
Commission element What V.Partners offers How it typically appears in reporting
Revenue Share (RevShare) Ongoing commission based on the net revenue/profit generated by referred players. RevShare is commonly presented as tiered (levels linked to monthly new depositor volume). Monthly revenue and deductions are reflected in net earnings; final payable balance follows the program’s settlement schedule.
CPA A fixed one-time payout per qualified acquisition (the exact qualification criteria and amount are defined in the agreement). Players/cases move through a qualification/validation status before CPA becomes payable.
Hybrid Combined model: a CPA component plus an ongoing RevShare percentage. Terms are agreement-based and can differ by brand/GEO. CPA is paid on qualified conversions, while RevShare continues to accrue from player activity under the same tracked account.
Negative carryover The program defines negative carryover as a financial mechanic, but it is not universal by default — it applies only if agreed in advance under the affiliate’s terms. If enabled, negative balances can offset future earnings; if not enabled, negative months do not roll forward in the same way.
Adjustments & invalidation Anti-fraud validation and compliance controls are part of the program rules; commissions can be adjusted/withheld in cases of fraud, policy violations, or non-compliant traffic. Transactions may be flagged, reversed, or excluded from payable totals after verification checks.
Brand-level variability V.Partners operates as a multi-brand platform — commercial terms (RevShare %, CPA value, hybrid splits) can differ across brands and markets. Each brand/campaign can have its own deal line and tracking configuration inside the account.
What makes the commission model attractive
  • Choice of deal type: RevShare, CPA, or Hybrid depending on acquisition strategy
  • RevShare scalability: tiered structures reward higher volumes (where enabled in the deal)
  • Commercial flexibility: terms are set at brand/GEO/agreement level rather than a single rigid rate
Key mechanics that materially change earnings
  • Negative carryover is agreement-dependent (not a universal default)
  • Qualification rules determine what counts as a payable CPA conversion
  • Verification/compliance can affect payable totals if traffic violates program rules
  • Brand selection matters because terms vary across the V.Partners portfolio
Practical summary:
V.Partners offers RevShare (often tiered), CPA, and Hybrid deals. Exact commission rates and qualification rules are defined by the specific brand and the affiliate’s agreement, with key mechanics like negative carryover applying only where explicitly agreed.
Visitor takeaway: V.Partners is structured for affiliates who want a choice between long-term earnings (RevShare), fixed acquisition payouts (CPA), or a combined Hybrid. Because it’s multi-brand, the commission structure is best evaluated at the brand + GEO + deal level rather than assuming one universal rate for the entire program.
Cookie Duration & Attribution V.Partners uses brand-level tracking settings — cookie duration varies by the promoted brand, with attribution rules applied per campaign configuration
Cookie: Brand-dependent

V.Partners operates as a multi-brand affiliate platform, so cookie duration is not uniform across the program. Each brand (and sometimes each campaign within a brand) can use its own cookie settings. As a result, the cookie window and attribution behavior should be treated as brand-level terms, not a single global V.Partners policy.

Cookie window: brand-dependent Attribution: campaign-level rules Common industry default: last-click Overwrite risk: multiple affiliate clicks Risk: cross-device journeys Risk: privacy/cookie blocking
Tracking element What V.Partners offers Attribution impact for visitors
Cookie duration Set per brand (and can vary by campaign). There is no single cookie duration that applies to all V.Partners brands. Registration/deposit attribution depends on the specific brand’s cookie window and the campaign configuration active for that affiliate link.
Attribution model Attribution is applied based on the tracking rules configured for the brand/campaign. In affiliate tracking, the most common default is last-click attribution unless a different rule is specified. If a user clicks a different affiliate’s link later, attribution can be reassigned depending on the brand’s configured rules.
Multi-brand behavior Different brands inside V.Partners can have different tracking windows and user flows. Cookie duration and attribution should be evaluated separately for each promoted brand rather than assuming identical tracking across the platform.
Cross-device journeys Tracking is normally browser/device-based, so cross-device behavior is a common limitation. If a user clicks on mobile but later registers on desktop, tracking may not persist unless the brand uses additional tracking mechanisms.
Privacy / cookie controls Tracking depends on cookies and tracking parameters; browser privacy controls can reduce persistence. Cookie blocking, referrer stripping, or cookie clearing can prevent the click from being attributed even within the intended cookie window.
GEO and compliance filtering Brands commonly apply GEO availability rules and traffic validation checks as part of attribution/acceptance. Even when a click is tracked, registrations from restricted GEOs or non-compliant flows may not be treated as valid conversions under the brand’s rules.
Where attribution tends to remain strongest
  • Single-session journeys (click → register → deposit without switching devices)
  • Browser-based signups with minimal tracking disruption
  • Brand-intent traffic where users register quickly after clicking
  • Users in supported GEOs with normal onboarding/KYC flows
What most commonly causes attribution loss
  • Cookie duration mismatch assumptions across different V.Partners brands
  • Multiple affiliate clicks before registration (overwrite risk)
  • Cross-device registration/deposit behavior
  • Cookie blocking, strict privacy settings, or cookie clearing
  • GEO restrictions or traffic validation removing a conversion from “valid” status
Practical summary:
V.Partners does not have one universal cookie duration. Cookie duration and attribution are defined at the brand (and sometimes campaign) level. Visitors comparing V.Partners offers should treat tracking terms as brand-specific rather than program-wide.
Visitor takeaway: V.Partners tracking is configured per brand. Cookie duration is brand-dependent, and attribution is applied according to the tracking rules of the specific brand/campaign. Cross-device signups, privacy blockers, and multiple affiliate clicks are the main factors that can prevent attribution even when a click happens inside the expected cookie window.
English
Target Market Who V.Partners brands are designed for (GEO varies by brand, plus the typical player personas that convert across casino/sportsbook offers)
iGaming · Multi-brand

V.Partners is a multi-brand iGaming affiliate program (casino and, depending on the brand, sportsbook-style offers). Because it’s a portfolio program, target countries and allowed regions are not identical across all brands. Each brand operates with its own market availability, licensing/regulatory positioning, and accepted GEO list. As a result, the practical target market is best described as adult (18+) iGaming users in permitted regions, with the exact GEO scope determined by the specific brand being promoted.

Primary GEO: Brand-dependent Audience: 18+ iGaming users Verticals: Casino (plus brand-specific extensions) Language/UX: Brand-dependent Payments & KYC: Brand-dependent
Best-fit user personas (casino-focused)
  • Slots-first players searching for game variety, daily promos, tournaments, and fast onboarding
  • Bonus-motivated users comparing welcome offers (where permitted) and wagering terms
  • Payment-method-led users choosing brands based on deposit/withdrawal options available in their region
  • Mobile-first gamblers who register and play mainly on mobile web or mobile app (brand-dependent)
  • VIP/value seekers who respond to loyalty/VIP framing and long-term retention mechanics
Where conversion intent is usually highest
  • Brand-intent searches (users already aware of the brand name)
  • “Best casino in [country]” style comparisons (GEO-specific and compliance-sensitive)
  • Game/provider pages (slots providers, live casino categories, “top RTP” themes)
  • Payment pages (e-wallet/crypto/bank options where the brand supports it)
  • New player funnels where the user registers shortly after first click
Segment What it includes How V.Partners fits
Permitted GEOs (per brand) Countries/regions where the specific V.Partners brand accepts registrations and deposits. The program structure allows affiliates to promote different brands for different markets, but the eligible GEO list must be checked at the brand level.
Casino-only audiences Users primarily interested in slots, live casino, table games, and casino promotions. Many V.Partners brands are casino-led, which typically aligns well with casino review and game-category traffic.
Payment-method-driven markets Regions where user choice is heavily influenced by local banking options, e-wallet adoption, or crypto preference. Payment availability differs by brand and market, so the most relevant offer is often the brand that best matches local deposit/withdrawal expectations.
Mobile-first users Users who register, deposit, and play mainly on mobile devices. Brand experiences vary, but modern iGaming conversion is frequently mobile-led, especially for casual casino audiences.
Compliance-sensitive markets Countries with strict gambling advertising rules, regulated frameworks, or partial restrictions. Market availability and permitted promotion approach are brand- and jurisdiction-dependent, so the applicable rules depend on the target region and the specific brand selected.
Practical “Target Market” summary:
Adult (18+) iGaming audiences in permitted regions, with market availability and GEO targeting determined at the individual brand level inside V.Partners. Best fit is casino-focused users (slots/live/table), plus payment-method-led and mobile-first segments where the promoted brand’s local availability matches user expectations.
Visitor takeaway: V.Partners is not a single-brand, single-GEO program. It is a multi-brand platform where the target market depends on the specific brand being promoted. Across the portfolio, the strongest match is typically casino-led audiences (18+) in markets where the brand is available and supports local onboarding, payments, and compliance requirements.
Skrill
Neteller
Bitcoin
Payouts & Payment Methods V.Partners payout cadence, method-specific minimum thresholds, and the payment rails available for affiliate withdrawals
Weekly payouts

V.Partners is positioned as a weekly-paying iGaming affiliate program. Payouts follow a recurring settlement rhythm where commissions are validated and then released through the selected withdrawal method. A key detail in V.Partners’ payout terms is that the minimum payout threshold depends on the payment method—with a significantly higher minimum for wire transfers compared with alternative payment systems.

Payout frequency: Weekly Ticketing: payout ticket created (weekly) Min payout (alt methods): €100 Min payout (wire): €500 Methods: Wire · Skrill · Neteller · Capitalist · BTC · USDT Availability: can vary by account/country
Item What V.Partners offers What to expect in practice
Payout cadence Weekly payouts on a recurring cycle (program operational flow described as weekly ticket creation and processing). Earnings typically move from pending/validated totals into a weekly payout run once the cycle closes and eligibility checks are complete.
Validation / hold logic iGaming-standard validation to manage fraud, bonus abuse, and chargeback risk (verification is part of payout eligibility). Newer accounts or unusual traffic patterns may experience longer validation timelines before earnings appear as payable.
Minimum payout threshold Threshold depends on payout rail: €100 for alternative payment methods and €500 for bank wire. Wire transfer withdrawals typically require higher accumulated balances; e-wallet/crypto options reach payout eligibility sooner for many affiliates.
Bank transfer (wire) Wire transfer payout option (generally used for direct banking). Higher minimum threshold (€500) and potential bank/intermediary fees depending on receiving bank and region.
Skrill / Neteller E-wallet payouts via Skrill and Neteller. Commonly used in iGaming affiliate payments; provider fees and account limitations depend on the payment service and user profile.
Capitalist Payout support via Capitalist (regional availability can vary). Often preferred in specific markets; processing speed and fees depend on provider and account verification level.
Crypto (BTC / USDT) Crypto payouts via BTC and USDT. Useful for international withdrawals; network fees, wallet requirements, and transaction confirmation times apply.
Method availability Multiple payment rails, but final availability can be account- and country-dependent. Some methods may be restricted by geography, compliance requirements, or account verification status.
What can delay payout release
  • Earnings still in validation/anti-fraud status
  • Balance below the method’s minimum threshold (€100 alt / €500 wire)
  • Incomplete or mismatched payout details (wallet/bank info)
  • Compliance or GEO-related issues affecting conversion validity
Payment methods at a glance
  • Wire transfer: higher minimum (€500), bank fee exposure
  • Skrill/Neteller: standard iGaming rails, provider fees apply
  • Capitalist: regional alternative, account limits may apply
  • BTC/USDT: international-friendly, network fees apply
Typical payout flow (simplified):
Earnings accrue from player activity → commissions are validated through the weekly cycle → a payout ticket is created → once the balance meets the method minimum and details are set, the withdrawal is processed through the selected payment rail.
Visitor takeaway: V.Partners is designed around a weekly payout model with multiple withdrawal options (wire, major e-wallets, and crypto). The most important operational detail is the method-based minimum: €100 for alternative methods versus €500 for wire transfer, alongside standard iGaming validation checks before funds are released.
Affiliate Approval Requirements V.Partners is a direct iGaming affiliate program — approval is based on traffic source review, compliance readiness, and brand/GEO eligibility
Direct program · Compliance-first

V.Partners approval is managed directly by the program (not through a third-party affiliate network). Account acceptance typically depends on three things: (1) a verifiable traffic source, (2) compliance with iGaming promotion standards, and (3) brand/GEO eligibility (because each brand inside V.Partners can have different allowed markets and rules). The program also operates with explicit anti-fraud verification, which affects both initial acceptance and ongoing commission validity.

Application: direct to V.Partners Review focus: traffic source + compliance Brand/GEO: must match permitted regions Verification: anti-fraud checks apply Ongoing requirement: policy compliance
Step 1 — Submit an application with a real traffic source
Required

V.Partners applications are typically reviewed based on the affiliate’s listed channels (e.g., website, social profiles, communities, media properties). The key requirement is that the traffic source is identifiable and reviewable.

Step 2 — Compliance screening (iGaming rules + acceptable promotion methods)
Strict

Approval is closely tied to compliance posture: the program’s rules prohibit misleading claims, spam/unsolicited promotion, artificial registrations, and any attempt to manipulate tracking or user actions. The program also expects affiliates to respect market restrictions (18+ targeting, restricted GEOs).

Step 3 — Brand + GEO alignment (portfolio-specific)
Important

Because V.Partners is multi-brand, approval is not only “account-level.” The practical permission to promote depends on which brand is being promoted and where the audience is located. Some brands are available only in specific GEOs.

Step 4 — Verification & ongoing validity checks
Ongoing

V.Partners describes anti-fraud validation as part of operations. That means “approved account” status does not override verification: traffic quality, player behavior patterns, and compliance can affect whether conversions remain valid for payment.

Requirement area What is expected What can block approval / invalidate conversions
Traffic source legitimacy A clearly reviewable channel (site/social/community) with an iGaming-relevant audience and transparent ownership. Missing/empty traffic source, unverifiable channels, or patterns that suggest proxy traffic or untraceable acquisition.
Promotion compliance iGaming-compliant promotion without misleading statements, false promises, spam/unsolicited ads, or prohibited incentives. Misrepresentation, spam, forced redirects, deceptive creatives, or user-flow manipulation.
GEO eligibility (brand-specific) Promotion aligned with permitted markets for the specific brand inside the V.Partners portfolio. Sending traffic from restricted/blocked regions or ignoring brand-level GEO acceptance limits.
Anti-fraud validation Genuine player acquisition with normal player behavior patterns and clean tracking signals. Bonus abuse patterns, fake registrations, suspicious deposits/withdrawals, multi-accounting, or other fraud indicators.
Account & payout setup Accurate profile details and valid payout information for the selected withdrawal method. Incomplete identity/payment details that prevent settlement or raise compliance concerns.
Most common reasons accounts struggle with approval
  • Traffic source is not verifiable (no live site, empty social profiles, no audience evidence)
  • Promotion method signals spam or misleading “too-good-to-be-true” claims
  • GEO mismatch (trying to promote brands into restricted markets)
  • Suspicious traffic patterns that trigger anti-fraud screening
What a “clean” approval profile looks like
  • Clear channel identity + consistent iGaming content or audience positioning
  • Compliance-ready messaging (18+ framing, no deceptive claims)
  • Brand selection aligned to permitted GEOs
  • Stable traffic patterns that look organic and user-driven
Practical summary:
V.Partners approval is primarily based on a reviewable traffic source, compliance readiness, and brand/GEO alignment. Because the program is multi-brand, market eligibility is evaluated at the brand level, and conversions remain subject to anti-fraud validation.
Visitor takeaway: V.Partners operates as a direct affiliate program with a compliance-first approval process. Account acceptance and ongoing commission validity depend on traffic source transparency, adherence to iGaming promotion standards, and promoting brands only in markets where they are permitted — with anti-fraud verification applied as part of normal operations.